METHODS
Between 1995 and 2014, patients with grade II gliomas were retrospectively analyzed. All patients received
radiotherapy (RT).
RESULTS
This study included 78 patients with median 44 (range, 6?137) months follow-up. Patients aged ?40 years
had a poorer overall survival (OS) than those aged <40 years (p=0.04). Patients with gross total resection/
subtotal resection had a longer OS than those with biopsy/partial resection (p=0.001). If the disease had
recurrence or progression during the follow-up period, the patients had a poorer OS (p=0.01). Patients
with a Ki-67 LI ?4% had a poorer OS than those with Ki-67 LI < 4% (p=0.001). The extent of resection,
recurrence, or progression, and Ki-67 ?4% were the independent prognostic factors for OS.
CONCLUSION
In our opinion, Ki-67 LI is an important prognostic factor for grade II gliomas, but it cannot be used as a
diagnostic measure alone. It must be used in combination with the other prognostic factors.
Keywords: Grade II glial tumors; Ki-67 labeling index; Prognostic factors; Radiotherapy; Survival
Proliferative phases of the cell cycle are composed of
G1-phase, S-phase, G2-phase, and M-phase. The Ki-67
monoclonal antibody is detected during all these proliferative
phases of the cell cycle, but absent in the resting
cells (G0-phase).[
2.2. Radiotherapy
2.3. Histopathology and Ki-67 expression
2.4. Clinical evaluation and follow-up
2.5. Statistical analysis
Radiotherapy is used in patients with tumors that cannot
be totally removed or in patients with high-risk features.[
Two experienced neuropathologist retrospectively redefined
all tumors based on the 2007 WHO classification
system for brain tumors.[
Following RT, patients were followed up every 3 months
for 2 years, every 6 months for 3-5 years, and annually
thereafter.
Statistical analyses were performed using Statistical
Package for Social Sciences software, v 13.0 (SPSS,
Chicago, IL, USA). Patient, disease, and treatment
characteristics were analyzed using descriptive statistics.
The median value, mean value, proportion value,
ranges, and standard deviation values were reported.
Categorical variables were compared using Pearson"s
Chi-square test, and continuous variables were compared
using independent samples t-test and ANOVA
test. Overall survival (OS) time was defined as the time
from diagnosis to the date of the death or last follow-up.
Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time
from diagnosis to the date of documented progression
or recurrence. Survival analyses were performed using
the Kaplan-Meier method, and subgroups were compared
using the two-sided log rank test. Cox proportional
hazard regression analysis was used for the estimation
of hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals
(CIs). Variables with statistical significance (p≤0.05)
in univariate analysis were included as covariates in
multivariate analysis. A two-sided p-value of ?0.05 was
considered to be statistically significant.
3.2. Treatment characteristics
Surgery was the initial treatment approach for all patients.
Gross total resection (GTR) was performed in
25 patients (32%), subtotal resection (STR) in 35 (45%),
partial resection (PR) in six (8%), and only biopsy (Bx)
in 12 (15%). Postoperatively, 51 patients (65%) received
adjuvant early RT, while 27 patients (35%) received adjuvant delayed RT. The median radiation dose was 54
(range, 50-66) Gy.
3.3. Ki-67 status
3.4. Survival analysis
Patients with a Ki-67 LI value of ?4% had a poorer
OS than patients with a Ki-67 LI value of <4%
(p=0.001). The mean OS was 96 months for patients
with a Ki-67 LI value of <4% versus 43 months for the
patients with a Ki-67 LI value of ?4% (Fig
Jaros et al. reported that the heterogeneity in Ki-67 LI
was around 20% astrositomas so that the average values
of Ki-67 LI represent the proliferative potential of the
tumor more than the maximal Ki-67 value.[
The median follow-up time was 44 (range, 6-137)
months. Fifty-six patients (72%) were alive and 20 of
them had a disease when the survival analysis was performed.
The mean OS was 88 (range, 73-102) months.
The 2-, 5-, and 10-year OS rates were 90%, 70%, and 40%, respectively. The extent of resection, recurrence,
or progression and average Ki-67 LI value were the significant
prognostic factors for OS. A trend of higher
survival was found in patients aged <40 years. The results
of univariate analysis for OS are summarized in
Table
In the current study, we aimed to investigate the possible prognostic relationship between Ki-67 LI and the outcomes of adults with grade II glial tumors who were treated with RT. According to our results, age, extent of resection, recurrence or progression, and average Ki-67 LI value were the significant prognostic factors for OS. The average Ki-67 LI value of ?4% was associated with OS. Patients with a Ki-67 LI value of ?4% had a poorer OS than patients with a Ki-67 LI value of <4%. PFS was not affected by Ki-67 LI according to our results. This can be explained by the fact that PFS may have been more influenced by other prognostic factors, such as variability of surgery and variability in the diagnosis of progression.
Despite numerous studies, there are questions
about the impact of Kİ-67 LI on survival.[
Although most of the studies showed a significant
increase in Ki-67 LI with the increasing grade of astrocytomas,
Ki-67 LI values overlapped in some studies.
[
According to our results, the other independent
prognostic factor that affected OS was recurrence or
progression of disease. Our current study revealed that
the avoidance of local recurrence or progression after
surgery was of comparable relevance to mortality. Local
recurrence or progression of disease after surgery
can be included as a risk factor predicting decreased OS for WHO grade II gliomas. There is a need for prospective
studies for the clarification of this issue.
WHO classification of central nervous system tumors
updated in 2016, which compose genotypic and
phenotypic parameters. The absence of re-classification
of tumors according to new version of WHO staging
and the retrospective feature of the study were the major
limitations of study.
Peer-review: Externally peer-reviewed.
Conflict of Interest: The authors declare that there is no conflict
of interest.
Funding: This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Acknowledgments: We thank the staff of the Departments of Neurosurgery, Neuropathology and Neuroradiology for their support.
Authorship contributions: Concept - G.K., E.Y.E.; Design - G.K., E.Y.E.; Supervision - G.K., E.Y.E., H.S.E.; Materials - G.K., E.Y.E., H.S.E., H.O., M.A., M.K., H.B., E.K.; Data collection &/or processing - G.K., E.Y.E., M.A., M.K., H.B., E.K.; Analysis and/or interpretation - G.K., E.Y.E., H.S.E.; Literature search - G.K., E.Y.E.; Writing - G.K., E.Y.E., H.S.E.; Critical review - G.K., E.Y.E., H.S.E.