Keywords: Cardiac failure; complete remission; gemcitabine; undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma
Presently, the management of patients with metastatic
STS usually includes palliative chemotherapy. Doxorubicin
and ifosfamide are the most active agents against
sarcomas, with a response rate of approximately 25%.
[
Gemcitabine is an analog of deoxycytidine that has demonstrated
clinical activity in a variety of solid tumors,
including bladder, lung, and pancreatic carcinomas.
[
UPS is a rare soft tissue neoplasm that was first reported
in 1977 and was further characterized by Weiss
in 1978.[
Knowledge regarding retroperitoneal STS"s clinical
course and management is limited because of the low
prevalence. The clinical course of retroperitoneal STS
is determined by tumor size, grade, and evidence of metastasis. The primary treatment for retroperitoneal
STS is surgical resection. Adjuvant radiation therapy
may be effective in controlling loco-regional recurrence;
however, with respect to adjuvant and palliative
systemic chemotherapy, data exist only from soft tissue
sarcomas at other sites of the body. Anthracyclinebased
chemotherapy may be effective, but its effect on
overall survival is yet to be reported. In the present
case, two months following surgery, soft tissue metastasis
developed and very good response was obtained
from a single-agent gemcitabine regimen.
Gemcitabine is known to have a high level of activity
in leiomyosarcoma and modest activity in other soft
tissue sarcomas.[
To our knowledge, we report the first documented
case of metastatic UPS that originated in the retroperitoneal
area, wherein the patient achieved a complete
radiographic response to a single-agent gemcitabine
regimen. This regimen has potential advantages over
frequently used anthracine-based regimen since it is
associated with less cardiotoxicity, improved tolerability,
and the convenience of outpatient administration.
These features may prove especially useful in patients
who are elderly, have comorbidities, or are afflicted
with retroperitoneal sarcomas.
Peer-review: Externally peer-reviewed.
Conflict of Interest: The authors declare no potential conflicts
of interest.
Authorship contributions: Concept - O.Ü.Ü.; Design - O.Ü.Ü.; Supervision - M.Y.; Data collection &/or processing - E.V.; Analysis and/or interpretation - T.A.; Literature search - U.V.; Writing - O.Ü.Ü., U.V.; Critical review - O.Ü.Ü., E.V.