METHODS
In this retrospective study, a total of 117 patients from four different oncology centers in Turkey between
2011 and 2017 were divided into 2 groups, namely, patients with complete response (group 1) and those
with no complete response (group 2) after platin-etoposide combination therapy.
RESULTS
The median age of the patients was 61 (range 38-81) years.The median follow-up time was 12 months
and 95 (81%) patients died. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated,
respectively, as 8 and 13 months. Overall survival of group 1 patients was statistically significantly better
than the group 2 (16 versus 10 months respectively and p=0.00). The overall survival of patients who
had late recurrent disease (>6 mo.) was statistically significantly better than the early ones (<6 mo) (19
versus 14 months respectively and p=0,008).
CONCLUSION
Complete response and recurrent free time were the prognostic factors for ES SCLC patients in our study
Keywords: Complete response; prognosis; small cell lung cancer
In this study, we aimed to evaluate the prognostic role of complete response rate and clinical outcomes in ES-SCLC.
Statistical Analysis
All results were presented as the rate of categorical values
or mean and median for continuous variables. Clinical
and statistical significant correlation between continuous
variables was calculated by Spearman"s rank correlation
test, and Spearman"s correlation coefficient and p
value (2 tailed) were noted. Overall Survival (OS) was
defined by the time from the date of death and last control
minus the first day of the chemotherapy. Survival
curves were estimated according to the Kaplan-Meier
method, and log-rank tests were used for univariate
statistical comparisons. Adjusted hazard ratio and 95%
confidence interval were used for estimation. All statistical
data were analyzed using the SPSS version 17.0, and
a p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Treatment and Outcomes
The median follow-up time was 12 months, and 95
(81%) patients were deceased. Progression-free survival
and OS were estimated as 8 and 13 months, respectively
(Figs.
OS of Group 1 patients was significantly better than
that of Group 2 patients (16 vs. 10 months, p=0.00)
(Fig.
SCLC is a disseminated disease in most patients
at presentation, and it is very responsive to chemotherapy.
The most important prognostic factor in
patients with SCLC is the extent of disease (stage) at
presentation. For patients with ES disease, the median
survival is 8-13 months, and the 5-year survival rate
is 1%-2%. For patients who respond well to first-line
systemic therapy, radiation therapy (prophylactic cranial
and thoracic therapy) may provide additional
benefits. Therefore, complete response to treatment is
important for prognosis. The median survival of patients
with relapsed SCLC ranges from 2 to 6 months.
[
In accordance with the information on SCLC, the
prognosis of patients who had complete response to
treatment was better than that of other patients (noncomplete
responders) in our study. However, no statistically
significant relationship was found between response
time (interim or end of treatment) and OS. The
patients who experienced relapse within 3 months of
the last day of initial treatment constitute the treatment-
resistant group. But in our study, OS rates were better
in patients whose recurrence-free period was less than
6 months. Prognostic importance of relapse-free survival
was shown in our study, and it was compatible
with literature. Additionally, in our study, patients with
liver metastases had worse prognosis, and these findings
are consistent with previous reports of patients
with SCLC with and without hepatic metastasis.[
Peer-review: Externally peer-reviewed.
Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest.
Financial Support: No support.
Authorship contributions: Concept - A.M.S.; Design -
A.M.S., A.T.S.; Supervision - A.T.S.; Materials - S.G., A.B.,
Z.Ç., A.M.S.; Data collection &/or processing - A.M.S., S.G.;
Analysis and/or interpretation - Z.Ç.; Literature search -
A.M.S., A.B.; Writing - A.M.S., A.T.S.; Critical review - A.T.S.