Keywords: Head and neck; oropharyngeal cancer; pediatric radiotherapy; pediatric tumors; tongue tumor
At this point, numerous blood tests were performed, including carcinoembryonic antigen, calcitonin, and thyroglobulin, all of which were within normal limits. A thorax computerized tomography (CT) scan was obtained, which did not provide any additional findings.
The patient then underwent a panendoscopy and a
biopsy of lesion at the base of the tongue. The biopsy of
the lesion confirmed the diagnosis of a poorly differentiated
carcinoma with p16 positivity and focal HPV
positivity (Fig.
With these findings, the patient was presented to
our multidisciplinary tumor board with the diagnosis
of a T1N1M0 carcinoma of the base of the tongue. Radiation
treatment was chosen as a single modality for
treatment. The primary tumor site was treated with 60
Gy in 1.8 Gy fractions, and the bilateral neck levels II-V
with 54 Gy in 1.6 Gy fractions, with volumetric modulated
arc treatment and simultaneous integrated boost
technique using two whole arcs of 6MV photons (Fig.
One year after the treatment, a PET/CT scan showed no evidence of disease. The fifth-year follow-up was not possible; however, the authors maintained uninterrupted email communication with the patient"s mother and received his photographs and medical records, therefore, they were able to learn that he continued to be healthy.
The possible cause of this tumor may be its particular
geographic location and pathology. This distinction
in etiology would be especially pronounced in pediatric
patients, in whom genetic syndromes may be a contributory
factor.[
Staging the tumor of this patient was difficult. We
were not able to use the TNM system [
Another problem we encountered was deciding
on the treatment option. The lesion"s largest diameter
was 17 mm, which might seem relatively small, however,
the lesion occupied more than half of the child's
tongue base and would have required that a significant
portion of the tongue be resected to obtain clear margins.
The postoperative period would have been very difficult, therefore, surgical resection of the lesion was
dismissed.
For patients with advanced oropharyngeal cancer,
up-front chemoradiotherapy, initial surgery with adjuvant
radiation or chemoradiation, or induction chemotherapy
followed by radiation or chemoradiation are
considered effective treatment options.[
Previously reported possible toxic effects of concurrent
chemotherapy in younger children [
In the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma,
a 5?10% reduction in the treatment dose is recommended
for children younger than 10 years.[
Informed consent: "Consent to publish" was obtained as a consent to publish from the participant"s mother to report individual patient data.
Peer-review: Externally peer-reviewed.
Conflict of Interest: The authors declare that they have no
competing interests.
Financial Disclosure: The authors declare that there is no
financial issue to disclose relevant to this study.
Authorship contributions: Concept - M.M.Ç., M.Ş.İ.; Design - M.M.Ç., M.Ş.İ.; Supervision - M.M.Ç., M.Ş.İ; Materials - M.M.Ç., M.Ş.İ; Data collection &/or processing - M.M.Ç., M.Ş.İ, G.D.; Analysis and/or interpretation - E.A., O.F., G.T. ; Literature search - M.M.Ç., M.Ş.İ, E.A.; Writing - E.A., O.F., G.T. ; Critical review - E.A., O.F., G.D.