METHODS
The medical charts of metastatic NSCLC were retrospectively reviewed. Histological subtype, performance
status, age, gender, smoking status, comorbidities, chemotherapeutics, and erlotinib that were
part of any type of treatment were recorded.
RESULTS
The median age of the patients was 61. The median follow-up period was longer for Group A (AMe users)
than Group C (control group) (18 vs. 11 months, p<0.001). At the time of analysis, 83.8% of the patients
had died. Univariate analysis showed that OS was significantly longer in Group A than Group C (21±4.2
vs. 11±0.9 months, p=0.004). In addition to AMe usage, female gender, smoking status, presence of hypertension,
and erlotinib usage also had significant impacts on OS (p<0.05 for all variables). The multivariate
analysis showed that only AMe (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.27-0.76, p=0.003) and erlotinib (HR:
0.45, 95% CI: 0.22-0.89, p=0.02) usage were correlated with significantly longer OS.
CONCLUSION
Taking AMe during systemic anti-cancer treatment may significantly prolong OS of patients with metastatic
NSCLC.
Keywords: Astragalus membranaceus; Herb; Mortality; Non-small cell lung cancer; Overall survival; Traditional Chinese medicine
Astragalus saponin IV which is one of the active
parts of AMe has been demonstrated that enhances
chemosensitivity to cisplatin by inhibiting B7-H3.[
This study aimed to determine whether AMe improves
the survival results of patients with metastatic
NSCLC, especially in patients with European descent.
We retrospectively collected the patients with minimum 6 months on Astragalus supplements during CT and targeted therapy. We record all medicine history along with supplement usage of patients at every visit routinely. The supplement had to be started with the first treatment cycle and used for at least 6 months. The patients who used minimum 6 months without other supplements and patients with no supplements as control group are included in the study. The exclusion criteria included being younger than 18 years old, using other group of herbal medicine, AM usage <6 months. Furthermore, patients with inadequate follow-up and had major record deficit in the file are excluded from the study. Each patient"s informed consent was obtained before searching medical records for study either on phone call or at visit, informed consent was obtained from legal heir of patients who were death at the time of analysis. The study was approved by Istanbul University, Institute of Oncology, Institutional Review Board (Number: 70973125-604.01.01).
SPSS for Windows version of SPSS 20.0 (Chicago, IL., USA) was employed for data analysis and probability values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. The following variables were considered confounding factors in multivariate models: (1) Histological subtype, (2) high-risk comorbidities, (3) age, (4) gender, (5) smoking history, (6) performance status, and (7) cancer treatments (intravenous CT, oral CT, and targeted therapies) after diagnosis. The follow-up duration was calculated from the date of the diagnosis to the date of death or last follow-up visit. The OS was defined as the time of diagnosis to the date of death. Quantitative data were presented as the means with standard errors, medians with minimums and maximums. The results of qualitative analyses were presented as frequencies and percentages. Relationships and comparisons of several clinical variables were evaluated through Pearson Chisquare. Fisher"s exact test was used where Pearson Chisquare test was inapplicable. We compared the OS of patients in Groups A and C using Kaplan-Meier estimates and the log-rank test for univariate analyses. Cox regression analysis was used to determine the association of AM usage and OS in the multivariate analysis.
Survival Results and Adjusted Hazard Ratio (HR)
for Death between AMe Users and Control Group
The median follow-up period was significantly longer for
A group than C group (18 vs. 11 months, p<0.001). At
the time of the analysis, 83.8% of the patients had died;
71 in Group C and 27 in Group A. In the univariate analysis,
the median OS was significantly longer in Group A
than Group C (21±4.2 vs. 11±0.9 months, p=0.004) (Fig.
In the multivariate analysis, only AMe and erlotinib
were associated with significant increases to OS. After
adjusting for age, comorbidities, and conventional
treatments, the Cox proportional hazard modeling revealed
that the overall HR of death was 0.46 (95% CI:
0.27-0.76, p=0.003) in AMe users, compared with the
control group (Table
The anti-cancer effect of AMe extract is not only
through the immunomodulatory effect but also through
growth pathways and perhaps through epigenetic effects.
AMe inhibits cell proliferation and induces cell
apoptosis through the PI3K/AKT/mTOR and ERK signaling
pathways.[
Our patient population is really in search of herbal
treatments. Actually, this leads to the use of treatments
of unknown origin that may cause serious side effects
in patients. A long time we have met with very serious
side effects that resulted from herbal medicine.
Moreover, these searches sometimes led to the financial
exploitation of our patients by malicious people.
So based on literature, we recommended to AMe with
commercial available form that has rational to offer
to our patients who were seeking herbal supplement
treatment advice to be clear to what they used. All
studies that previously mentioned revealed questions
about survival effect of supplement in our cohort, so
we held this study. Although there are publications that
suggest otherwise,[
Cancer patients frequently receive cardiovascular
medications, including renin-angiotensin system
blockers (RASBs), because cardiovascular diseases are
common in the population. RASBs may provide synergistic
effects with systemic cancer treatment by reducing
angiotensin 2-mediated cell proliferation and
angiogenesis.[
There is little possibility for complete remission
in metastatic lung cancer patients with CT alone. Immunotherapy
may offer the best chance for a complete
response.[
There are some limitations of this study that should
be mentioned. Since this is a retrospective study, patient
selection bias and time trend bias are inevitable.
Another major limitation pertains to un availability of
immunotherapies in our patient population that resulted
better survival than conventional therapies we
used. Although, we aimed to assess the effect of AMe,
we cannot rule out imbalances or the heterogeneity of
the treatment regimens utilized and toxicities of the
systemic anti-cancer treatment that may have effect on
survival results. Furthermore, again in this retrospective
analysis, adverse events and toxicities that did not
recorded could not be irrefutable.
Acknowledgments: We did not receive substantial contribution
from non-authors. This report was presented briefly
as poster presentation at World Congress of Lung Cancer in
2017 at Yokohama, Japan. In addition, we used the STROBE
cohort checklist when writing our report.[
Peer-review: Externally peer-reviewed.
Conflict of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest
to declare.
Ethics Committee Approval: Approved by Institutional
Review Board in 2016.
Financial Support: This research did not receive any specific
grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial,
or not-for-profit sectors.
Authorship contributions: Concept - A.A., R.Ç.; Design
- A.A., N.A.; Supervision - N.C., A.A., N.A.; Funding -
A.A.; Materials - A.A.; Data collection and/or processing
- R.Ç., N.A.; Data analysis and/or interpretation - A.A.,
N.A.; Literature search - N.A.; Writing - N.A.; Critical review
- N.A., R.Ç., N.C., A.A.