METHODS
Promoter hypermethylation of PTCH1 gene was analyzed using Methylation-Specific Polymerase Chain
Reaction and protein expression pattern was studied using western blotting.
RESULTS
Promoter hypermethylation of the PTCH1 gene was found in 42.42% (14/33) and 55.73% (34/61) of
Pancreatic and Colorectal tumor samples, respectively. A significant correlation was found between
PTCH1 hypermethylation and smoking status in PC while PTCH1 hypermethylation in CRC was significantly
correlated with late-stage disease and lymph node metastasis. PTCH1 protein was under expressed
in 30.3% (10/33) and 50.8 % (31/61) of Pancreatic and Colorectal tumor samples, respectively.
Methylation analysis of PTCH1 in Pancreatic adenocarcinoma cell line 1 (PANC-1) and Colorectal adenocarcinoma
cell line (HT-29) revealed hemi methylation in PANC-1, complete methylation in HT-29
and methylation was clearly associated with loss of expression.
CONCLUSION
Our results indicate that epigenetic silencing of the PTCH1 promoter and concomitant loss of PTCH1
protein expression may play an important role in the development and progression of these cancers.
Keywords: Colorectal cancer; pancreatic cancer; patched homolog 1; promoter methylation; western blotting
Patients and Samples
Keeping power of study as 80% the sample size was calculated
using the statistical software G POWER v 20.1.1.
The present study included PC (n=33) and CRC (n=61)
patients who underwent surgical resection of colorectal
or pancreatic tumors in the Department of General
Surgery and Surgical Gastroenterology, respectively,
from March 2018 to September 2020. The diagnosis of
PC and CRC was based on the standard histopathological
criteria. All patients had 1st-time diagnosis and
did not receive any adjuvant chemo/radiotherapy. The
patients having any other type of malignancy or genetic
disorder were excluded from the study. Tumor tissues
along with their adjacent normal tissues (controls) were
taken from every enrolled cancer patient for analysis.
Margins of resection were well marked.
Cell Culture
Colorectal adenocarcinoma cell line (HT-29) and Pancreatic
adenocarcinoma cell line 1 (PANC-1) cell lines
were purchased from National Centre for Cell Science
(Pune, India). Both the cell lines were grown in the
DMEM (Sigma?Aldrich, MA), supplemented with
10% fetal bovine serum (Sigma-Aldrich, MO), and
100 units of penicillin/ml and 100 µg of streptomycin/
ml (Hyclone, South Logan, UT). Cells were incubated
at 37°C in a humidified CO2 incubator supplemented
with 5% CO2 (Eppendorf Brunswick).
DNA Extraction
DNA was extracted from the tissues and cell lines
with the help of Zymo DNA extraction kit according
to manufacturer's instructions (Zymo Research Corp.
Irvine, CA, USA). The quality and purity of DNA were
assessed by agarose gel electrophoresis and optical
density measured at A260/A280.
Methylation Specific Polymerase Chain Reaction
(MS-PCR)
The methylation status of PTCH1 promoter region was
determined for each patient sample using Methylation Specific Polymerase Chain Reaction (MS-PCR). To this
end, 1-2 µg genomic DNA isolated from PC and CRC
tissues and their adjacent normal tissues as well as cell
lines were modified with sodium bisulfite using the EZ
DNA Methylation Kit (Zymo Research Corp. Irvine, CA,
USA). The modified DNAs were immediately used for
MS-PCR analysis using primers, designed, and targeted,
for the promoter region of the PTCH1 gene. Each primer
pair targeted the methylated and the unmethylated alleles
of the promoter region; Methylated Forward: 5"
AATTAAGGAGTTGTTGCGGTC-3" Methylated Reverse:
5"GCTAAACCATTCTATCCCCGTA-3", Unmethylated
Forward: 5"ATTAAGGAGTTGTTGTGGTTGT-3"
and Unmethylated Reverse: 5" ACTAAACCATTCTAT
CCCCATA-3" producing the 125 bp and 124 bp product,
respectively. PCR cycling conditions for both unmethylated
and methylated primers were 95°C for 8 min, followed
by 40 cycles of 95°C for 1 min, 62°C for 1 min, and
72°C for 50 s, followed by a final elongation at 72°C for 7
min. Universal methylated DNA (Sigma Aldrich, USA)
was used as positive control and water as negative control.
Protein Extraction
For protein extraction, the tissue samples and the cells
harvested from the culture were washed 2-3 times with
ice cold PBS by centrifuging at 7000 rpm for 5 min.
This was followed by lysis using NP-40 lysis buffer (20
mM Tris-HCl; pH 8.0, 137 mM NaCl, 1% Nonidet
P-40, 1% glycerol, 2 mM EDTA, 10 mM NaF, 1 mM
PMSF, and protease inhibitor cocktail 10 µl/1 ml of lysis
buffer). After that samples were vortexed and incubated
on ice for 1 h. This was followed by centrifuging
at 10,000 rpm for 20 min after which supernatant was
collected to obtain protein extract. The protein concentration
was determined spectrophotometrically at 595
nm using the Bradford assay.
Antibodies
Rabbit polyclonal antibody against PTCH1 was used
at 1:1000 dilution (Santa Cruz technology; USA). Rabbit
monoclonal antibody against beta-actin was used at
1:1000 dilution (Cell Signaling technology; USA) and
was used as loading control. The fluorescence-tagged
secondary antibody was used for the final detection
of protein bands (anti-rabbit IR Dye 800; dilution
of 1:10000 and anti-mouse IR dye 680; dilutions of
1:20000) from LI-COR Biosciences; the USA.
Western Blotting
After quantitation and normalization, 40 µg of protein
was resolved on 12% SDS-PAGE and transferred to PVDF membrane (Millipore, USA) using a semidry
transfer method in accordance with manufacturer
protocol (Hoefer, USA). For blocking membrane was
treated with blocking buffer comprising of 3% BSA in
PBS for 1 h after which membrane was probed with
primary antibodies overnight, washed with PBST, and
probed with secondary antibodies. Fluorescence was
detected using Odyssey infrared detection system (LICOR
Biosciences, USA).
Quantification of Western Blots
Densitometric analysis for quantification of western
blots was performed by Image J software (NIH, Maryland
USA) to measure the amount of protein present.
Each protein band was normalized with the control
protein band of beta-actin.
Statistical Analysis
Statistical tests were performed using the software
SPSS 16.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois). Independent
t-test and paired t-test were performed for continuous
variables; Pearson's χ2 test, Fisher's exact test or χ2 test
(trend) for discrete variables. The odds ratios (ORs)
and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were obtained using
logistic regression analysis. A two-sided p<0.05
was considered as significant.
Promoter Hyper Methylation of PTCH1 in CRC
and PC; Correlation with Clinicopathological
Characteristics
Representative pictures for MS-PCR analysis observed
in PC and CRC are demonstrated in Figure
PTCH1: Patched homolog 1; PC: Pancreatic cancer; CRC: Colorectal cancer; MSP: Methylation Specific PCR.
In PC, the PTCH1 promoter region was found to
be hypermethylated in 14 out of 33 cases (42.42%).
Out of 14 PC cases with hypermethylation, only 2 (14.28%) samples showed both methylated and unmethylated
bands in the tumor tissues. Table
In CRC, the promoter region was found to be hypermethylated
in 34 out of 61 cases (55.73%). Out of 34
CRC cases with hypermethylation, 02 (5.88%) samples
showed both methylated and unmethylated bands in
the tumor tissues. Table
Expression of PTCH1 Protein in CRC and PC; Correlation
with Clinicopathological Characteristics
Since promoter hypermethylation is known to influence
gene expression, we examined the expression of
the PTCH1 protein in all PC (n=33) and CRC (n=61)
cases and their corresponding normal tissues by western
blotting.
In PC, we observed that 10 (30.30%) cases showed
reduced PTCH1 protein expression compared to the
adjacent normal tissues. The representative pictures
are shown in Figure
PTCH1: Patched homolog 1; PC: Pancreatic cancer; PVDF:
Polyvinylidene difluoride.
In CRC, out of 61 cases, 31 (50.81%) showed reduced
PTCH1 protein expression compared to the adjacent
normal tissues. The representative results are shown in
Figure
PTCH1: Patched homolog 1, CRC: Colorectal cancer;
PVDF: Polyvinylidene difluoride.
Correlation of PTCH1 Hypermethylation and Expression
Correlation of PTCH1 gene methylation and expression
is shown in Table
PTCH1: Patched homolog 1, PC: Pancreatic cancer, CRC: Colorectal cancer.
In CRC, out of 34 cases harboring promoter hypermethylation
of PTCH1, 23 (67.64%) showed reduced expression whereas in 11 (32.35%) cases protein expression
comparable to normal tissues was observed.
Of the remaining 27 CRC cases without the evidence
of promoter hypermethylation reduced expression
was observed in 08 cases and expression was normal
in 19 cases. Overall PTCH1 promoter, hypermethylation
was found to be significantly correlated with
loss of protein expression (OR=0.2, 95% CI=0.06-0.6,
p=0.003). Graphical representation of PTCH1 gene
methylation and its effect on expression in CRC is
shown in Figure
Promoter Hypermethylation and Protein Expression
of PTCH1 in PC and CRC Cell Lines
PANC-1and HT-29 were evaluated for methylation and
expression pattern of PTCH1. In PANC-1 cells, methylation
analysis by MS-PCR revealed partial methylation.
Both methylated and unmethylated bands were observed whereas, in HT-29 cells, complete methylation
was observed (Fig.
PTCH1: Patched homolog 1, HT-29: Colorectal adenocarcinoma
cell line; PANC-1: Pancreatic adenocarcinoma cell
line 1; MSP: Methylation Specific PCR.
The sample size was smaller for PC typically as compared to CRC because most patients diagnosed were in the terminal stage of the disease and surgically inoperable. In PC (n=33), we found that the PTCH1 gene was hypermethylated in 42.42% (14/33) of the cases. Similarly, in CRC 55.73% (34/61) had a hypermethylated PTCH1 promoter. About 14.28% and 5.88% of tumor tissues showed both methylated and unmethylated bands in PC and CRC, respectively, which could possibly be due to the admixture of normal cells, tumor heterogeneity, and/or mono-allelic methylation.
In our study, the frequency of PTCH1 promoter hypermethylation
was higher in CRC (55.73%) than in PC
(42.42%). The methylation status of the PTCH1 promoter
in PC has never been reported so far. Only one
study by Peng et al.[
Hypermethylation of PTCH1 was found to be significantly
associated with the smoking status in both
PC and CRC patients. Studies in the past have reported
epigenetic destruction of genome due to tobacco smoking.[
We observed loss of PTCH1 protein expression in
30.30% (10/33) of PC cases and 50.81% (31/61) of CRC
cases. Similar pattern of low PTCH1 mRNA expression
have been reported in esophageal squamous cell cancer
and was related to poor prognosis.[
In the present study, a significant correlation between
PTCH1 promoter hypermethylation and loss of
protein expression in both cancers was observed suggesting
that PTCH1 hypermethylation has a sustainable
effect on protein expression which is in line with
a study in Gastric cancer wherein promoter hypermethylation
of PTCH1 caused a total loss of PTCH1 protein
expression.[
In PANC-1 cell line, hypermethylation analysis revealed
a hemimethylated state with a moderate PTCH1
protein expression suggesting partial methylation does
not cause total loss of expression. In PC the sample size
for our study was small. Furthermore, a hemimethylated
state was detected in PANC-1 cell line; therefore,
further studies with larger sample size are clearly
needed to strengthen our understanding of PTCH1
hypermethylation in PCs.
In HT-29 cell line, PTCH1 promoter hypermethylation
with loss of PTCH1 protein expression was
observed. Similar observation was found in Breast
cancer cell line (MCF-7), Breast cancer samples,
Gastric cancer cell line (ASG), and Gastric cancer
tissues wherein PTCH1 promoter was found to be
hypermethylated with loss of PTCH1 mRNA levels.
[
Limitations of the Study
Considerable number of patients in this region was diagnosed
with advanced stage PC and was in-operable.
For that reason, the tumor tissue could not be collected from those very patients. Therefore, studies are warranted
to validate the results, especially in case of PC,
due to relatively modest sample size.
Acknowledgments: The authors gratefully acknowledge the technical staff of the Department of General Surgery and Surgical Gastroenterology who helped us in procuring the tissue samples.
Peer-review: Externally peer-reviewed.
Conflict of Interest: All authors declared no conflict of interest.
Ethics Committee Approval: The study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee Sher-I-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences Srinagar having Institutional Review Board (IRB) (No: SIMS 1 131/IEC-SKIMS/2015-183, Date: 03/09/2015).
Financial Support: The Study was supported by Sher-IKashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Soura, Srinagar, Kashmir 190011 India (Grant no# No. SIMS/Acad/20 of 2015).
Authorship contributions: Concept - M.N., M.S.K.; Design - M.S.K.; Supervision - S.M., R.A.W., O.J.S., S.B.; Funding - S.M.; Materials - M.N., M.S.K., A.S., R.A.W., O.J.S, S.B., S.M.; Data collection and/or processing - M.N., M.S.K., A.S.; Data analysis and/or interpretation - M.N., M.S.K., A.S.; Literature search - M.N., M.S.K., A.S., R.A.W., O.J.S., S.B.; Writing - M.N., M.S.K.; Critical review - M.N., M.S.K.