METHODS
CT scans were performed to 16 patients with maximum neck extension and treatment plans were prepared
with VMAT fields with 6MV energy. CBCT scanning was performed to all patients before the
treatment and necessary corrections were made. Then, simultaneous intrafraction CBCT scanning with
the VMAT field was performed during the treatment. When the treatment field was over, the deviation
amounts between CT and CBTC in the lateral, vertical and longitudinal axes were determined.
RESULTS
The deviation amount ? ±0.1cm was determined with 293 fractions in the lateral axis, 260 fractions in
the vertical axis and 263 fractions in the longitudinal axis. Maximum deviation values were determined
as 0.2 cm in the lateral axis, 0.5cm in the vertical axis and 0.5cm in the longitudinal axis. If the treatment
has a 0.2cm CTV-PTV margin (for 305 fractions), treatment can be performed at a confidence interval
of 100% on the lateral axis, 96.1% on the vertical axis and 94.1% on the longitudinal axis.
CONCLUSION
With the help of intra-faction monitoring, we are able to adjust the target margins and doses more precisely
in laryngeal radiotherapy, especially for stereotactic treatment. To reduce possible movements in
laryngeal radiotherapy, a maximum neck extension should be performed.
Keywords: Intra-fraction motion; intra-fraction CBCT; laryngeal motion
The success of RT treatment is directly related to the
delivery of the treatment. Daily set-up variations and
internal organ motions may lead to changes in dose
distribution and target misalignment. Therefore, all uncertainties
with a potential effect on the outcome of the
treatment must be determined. The effects of these uncertainties
on the planned dose distribution must be as
low as possible since the possible mistakes that are to be
caused by these uncertainties may change the outcome
of the treatment.[
Along with the developing technologies and techniques,
the trend towards hypofractionated treatment
is increasing. In early stage laryngeal radiotherapy, hypofractionated
treatments are an advantageous treatment in regards to both shortening of the treatment
period and increasing local control.[
The patients were irradiated in Elekta Versa HD (Elekta, Crawley, UK). This linear accelerator can deliver flattened photon beams (6MV, 10MV, 15MV), flattening filter-free (6MV-FFF, 10MV-FFF) photon beams as well as electron beams. The agility collimator system has a 160 Multi-Leaf Collimator (MLC) system. The MLCs have a width of 0.5 cm, an effective speed of 6.5 cm/s, and leakage of 0.5%.
In our study, the IGRT system was used as the Elekta
X-ray Volume Imaging (XVI) (Elekta, Stockholm, Sweden).
A kilo-Voltage Cone Beam computed tomography
(kV-CBCT) image set consisting of several twodimensional
projection images acquired at different
positions around the patient and reconstructed into
a 3D volume. XVI system kV-CBCT three-axis image
was obtained. The planning CT and CBCT images were
compared in XVI and couch shift values in x, y, z and
pitch, roll, yaw directions were determined. The necessary
couch angle and shift values were set in six dimensions
by hexapod couch.[
In each fraction, the initial setup was obtained by
aligning lasers with pencil markings on the mask. For
each patient, two CBCT scans were performed daily.
After setting up the patient on the treatment couch
with room lasers, the first scan was performed and registered
to the reference CT using the thyroid cartilage
as the matching structure. In our clinic, according to XVI "head and neck" Protocol (100 kV, 18.3 mAs), 2D
portal projections were taken in a 200° gantry angle
range, and 3D volumes were constructed. In the second
scan, a 2D projection was scanned on the XVI system
synchronously with the VMAT field during the treatment
and 3D images were obtained. According to the
XVI "intrafraction" Protocol (120 kV, 146.4 mAs), 2D
portal projections were scanned at 200° or 360° angle
and 3D images were obtained. In the second scan, the
intrafraction CBCT was matched with the reference CT
and the amount of thyroid cartilage movement during
the treatment was determined. Deviations in the leftright
(LR), craniocaudal (CC) and anterior-posterior
(AP) directions were obtained. Thus, any motion that
could occur in the target volume during irradiation
was detected (Fig.
Generally, a deviation of less than 0.1 cm was observed
in the LR, CC and AP directions during the treatment. The vertical and longitudinal directions
showed a higher deviation than the lateral direction.
Absolute averages (plus and minus direction independent)
were determined as 0.022±0.04 cm in the
LR direction, 0.064±0.09 cm in the CC direction and
0.077±0.08 cm in the AP direction. Absolute maximum
deviation values (plus and minus direction independent)
were 0.2 cm in the LR direction, 0.5 cm in the
CC direction, and 0.5 cm in the AP direction. Figures
In stereotactic treatments, the motion should be restricted in to reduce possible errors. The possible amount of movement must be determined and the safety margins must be adjusted accordingly.
Peer-review: Externally peer-reviewed.
Conflict of Interest: None declared.
Financial Support: None declared.
Authorship contributions: Concept - İ.F.D., Ö.E.U.; Design - İ.F.D., B.T., Ö.E.U.; Supervision - İ.F.D.; Funding - None; Materials - İ.F.D., B.T., Ö.E.U.; Data collection and/or processing - İ.F.D., B.T., Ö.E.U.; Data analysis and/or interpretation - İ.F.D., B.T., Ö.E.U.; Literature search - İ.F.D.; Writing - İ.F.D., B.T., Ö.E.U.; Critical review - İ.F.D., B.T., Ö.E.U.