METHODS
The experimental rats were randomized and grouped as follows: Group I (control), Group II (receiving
ionizing radiation), and Group III (receiving thymol + ionizing radiation). Pathological tissue damage
was assessed by immunohistochemical and biochemical analyses using chemical methods.
RESULTS
The level of plasma malondialdehyde (MDA) in both the tissues were significantly elevated in Group II
compared to that in Group I (p<0.001 for both the tissues), but they were significantly lower in Group III
than in Group II (p<0.01 for both the tissues). In addition, the plasma MDA level in both the tissues was
increased in Group III than in Group I (p<0.05 for both the tissues). The level of superoxide dismutase
(SOD) and glutathione (GSH) in the liver and kidney tissues were significant decreased in Group II than
in Group I (p<0.001 for both the tissues and for both the parameters), while these parameters were increased
in Group III relative to those in Group II (p<0.05 for both the tissues and for both the parameters).
Moreover, the plasma SOD and GSH levels in both the tissues were decreased in Group III than in Group I
(p<0.05 for both the tissues and for both the parameters). All these findings were supported by the pathological
images of caspase-3 and 8-OHdG tests conducted in the study.
CONCLUSION
Our results demonstrated that the treatment of thymol in the rat models is useful in diminishing the
liver and kidney damages caused by the application of ionizing radiation.
Keywords: Caspase-3; ionizing radiation; livers; kidneys; thymol; 8-OHdG
Experimental Procedures
Histopathological and Immunohistochemical Procedures
Biochemical Procedures
Statistical Analysis
A total of 30 female Wistar rats were categorized into 3
groups. The experimental groups and the protocol are
summarized as follows: Group I (control group): Including
rats that did not receive any treatment. Group
II (ionizing radiation group): Including rats that were
anesthetized with ketamine/xylazine, after which 8
Gray external irradiation was applied to their abdominal
regions. Radiotherapy was applied using the 13.6
Version Varian Trilogy Device (Series No: 6196 USA).
After approximately 36 h of the irradiation, these rats
were sacrificed with high-dose anesthesia, and their
liver and kidney tissues were quickly removed. Group
III (thymol + ionizing radiation group): Including rats that received thymol (7.5 mg/kg body weight) prepared
in 0.5% DMSO and administered orally once a day for
14 days through an intragastric tube. The ionizing radiation
was applied 12 h following the administration
of the last thymol dose. The thymol dose was selected
as suggested elsewhere.[
Immediately after necropsy, the kidney and liver tissue
samples were placed in formalin solution for 48 h for
histopathological evaluation. They were then stained
with hematoxylin-eosin stain and examined under a
light microscope (DM 1000; Leica, Germany). All specimens
intended for immunoperoxidase assay were passed
through graded xylol and alcohol series. Phosphatebuffered
saline (PBS) was then applied to the sections
and placed into 3% H2O2 for 10 min for endogenous
peroxidase inactivation. In order to reveal the antigen
contained in the tissues, the specimens were permitted
to cool together with a retrieval solution, following processing
in a microwave oven for 2×5 min at 500 watts.
The tissues were incubated with caspase-3 and 8-OHdG
(Catalog no: sc-56053, sc-66036 Santa Cruz, USA) at 60
min with an apoptotic marker at 37 °C. An immunohistochemistry
kit (AbcamHRP/DAB Detection IHC kit)
was used as per the manufacturer"s instructions. 3-3-Diaminobenzidine
(DAB) was used as the chromogen.
Hematoxylin was applied for soil staining. The sections
were classified as either non-positive (-), mild (+), moderate
(++), severe (+++), or very severe (++++).
Immediately after collection, the kidney and liver tissues
were washed in cold saline and stored at -80 °C.
Briefly, the tissues were crushed in liquid nitrogen
using the Tissue Lyser II Grinding Jar Set (Qiagen,
Hilden, Germany). Approximately 50 mg of the sample
was homogenized in 1 mL of PBS homogenate buffer
inside an Eppendorf tube by using the Tissue Lyser II
set, followed by centrifugation. The SOD, GSH, and
MDA levels of the homogenates were determined by
ELISA (Enzyme-Linked ImmunoSorbent Assay), as
described in some previous studies.[
One-way analysis of variance and Duncan's test were
applied for the analysis of the oxidant and antioxidant
parameters. At histopathological examination, the
Kruskal-Wallis test was applied to compare the differences
between semi-quantitative data and the Mann-Whitney U-test so as to compare the binary groups.
The SPSS 13.0 software was used for all analyses. The
results were expressed as mean ± standard deviation
(mean±SD). The P values of 0.05 were considered to be
statistically significant.
Histopathological Findings for the Kidney Tissues
Group I: The kidney tissues exhibited a normal histological
structure (Fig.
Immunohistochemical Findings in the Liver Tissues
Group I: No expression of caspase-3 was detected on
immunohistochemical examination of the liver tissues
(Fig.
Immunohistochemical Findings in the Kidney Tissues
Group I: Immunohistochemical examination of the renal
tissues revealed no 8-OHdG expression (Fig.
Biochemical Results for the Liver and Kidney Tissues
The parameter values of the rat groups are expressed as
mean±SD in Table
Thymol scavenges intensive free radicals produced
in various experimental models.[
Peer-review: Externally peer-reviewed.
Conflict of Interest: The authors declare no conflicts of interest
Ethics Committee Approval: This experimental study was
approved by the Atatürk University Local Animal Ethics
Committee (27.04.2018/114), and the experimental procedures
were conducted at the Atatürk University Medical
Faculty Department of Radiation Oncology, the Veterinary
Faculty Pathology Laboratory, the Faculty of Pharmacy Biochemistry
Laboratory, and the Experimental Animal Research
and Application Center (ATADEM), Turkey.
Financial Support: The authors declare that this study received
no financial support.
Authorship contributions: Concept - H.K.Ö.; Design
- H.K.Ö., F.N.E.A.; Supervision - H.K.Ö., F.N.E.A., A.T.;
Funding - None; Materials - H.K.Ö., F.N.E.A., A.T.; Data
collection and/or processing - H.K.Ö., S.Y., Y.B., G.E., A.K.,
Y.Ş.; Data analysis and/or interpretation - H.K.Ö., S.Y., Y.B.,
G.E., A.K., Y.Ş.; Literature search - H.K.Ö., F.N.E.A.; Writing
- H.K.Ö.; Critical review - H.K.Ö., F.N.E.A.